Shoulder supports and devices

There are numerous variations in supports available for hemiplegic shoulder pain. Their aim is to re-align the shoulder complex into a normal position.

The success or failure of these supports is often associated with:

  • The complexity of the design which affects application
  • The patient’s compliance with wearing the support
  • Staff compliance with the support wearing schedule
  • The patient’s size – off-the-shelf designs may not be suitable for all patients
  • The extent of the paresis and extent of the patient’s involvement in physical rehabilitation
  • The severity and irritability of the pain
person wearing shoulder support attached to right shoulder
Shoulder supports

See left for an example of such a support:

Cochrane review on the use of supportive devices for the shoulder following stroke

Strapping can be used as a custom made solution for re-alignment of the shoulder which may be effective in reducing pain in the acute setting. Clinician judgement and care must be exercised in deciding the length of time of the application as there is a risk of skin breakdown.

The photographs below show shoulder strapping being applied:

side-on view of right shoulder being strapped with dressings
side-on view of right shoulder being strapped with dressings
Shoulder strapping

 

Cochrane comparison of shoulder strapping techniques

Devices:

Electrical Stimulation (ES): is a treatment modality which uses electrodes applied to the skin which stimulate the muscles to contract. It has been shown that ES decreases subluxation and shoulder pain in post acute care following stroke. These benefits may not be maintained beyond 6 months.

Cochrane review on the use of electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post stroke shoulder pain

Other pain relieving modalities may include:

  • Acupuncture
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
  • Ultrasound
  • Interferential therapy

Cochrane review on physiotherapy for shoulder pain

Medications

A picture of medication

Pain is a presenting feature that may interfere with rehabilitation and cause distress to people after stroke with as many as 42% reporting some painful experience. There is still a general lack of knowledge about the way pain is perceived and reported by people with brain damage in general, and stroke in particular and it is often an overlooked symptom not well addressed in clinical care.

Analgesic intervention should match the nature and severity of the pain. There will be locally agreed protocols on the prescription of analgesia which usually follow a ‘staged’ management approach similar to that below:

A graph that shows pain medicine against increasing severity. The bottom tier is 'Non-opiod, e.g. paracetamol. The middle tier is 'NSAID; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, e.g. ibuprofen, mefenamic acid). The top tier is 'Opiods e.g. morphine, dihydrocodeine, fentanyl patches

Click here for the updated WHO 4 step pain ladder

To achieve the optimal analgesic affect prescribed medications should be:

  • Appropriate to the pain described
  • Given regularly and as prescribed. A loading dose may need to be established and maintained for the drug to be able to work effectively
  • Sufficient to enable the patient to engage in physical rehabilitation
  • Discussed regularly within the multidisciplinary team

NB: NSAID’s are not recommended for use in post stroke care due to a potential increased risk of bleeding if taken with antiplatelet therapy.

Patients should be made aware of the potential side effects of the medications being administered and should be closely observed for any signs of these adverse effects.

There are a number of pain assessment tools available, some of which are aphasia friendly.

Alternative methods of administration e.g. via nasogastric tube need to be considered for patients with dysphagia who cannot take medications orally.

Other interventions may include injecting the shoulder with corticosteroid or anaesthesia. In some cases hypertonus can be treated with injections of botulinum toxin but this treatment option is unusual in the early stages of stroke rehabilitation.

For more information

Feeding, nutrition and hydration following stroke: Medications

RCP Guideline for Stroke – 2016 5th Version

WHO Analgesic Ladder  (updated 2020)

NICE Chronic pain in over 16s: Assessment and management (draft 2020)

 

Anatomy of the shoulder

A x-ray of a 'normal shoulder' with captions pointing to; 'sub-acrominal space' 'head of humerus (large articular surface) and 'glenoid fossa (small artictular surface)

The integrity of the shoulder joint relies on muscular strength because as you can see left, the bony articular surfaces of the head of humerus and glenoid fossa differ in size to allow for a large range of movement at the shoulder. This results in a natural instability which means that the shoulder is at risk of dislocation and damage. Control of the range of motion at the shoulder involves a number of small muscles whose tendons pass between the moving bony surfaces. These may easily be damaged if the bony alignment is compromised.

Investigations

A diagram of a shoulderX-ray

Useful in identifying bony displacement and / or underlying fractures. A thorough clinical assessment will inform the best physical management, however in the presence of hemiplegia, precisely locating the anatomical structure involved is difficult as many of the diagnostic tests cannot be used. The presence or absence of subluxation can be determined by using palpation of the sub-acromial space.

MRI

Scanning has been used for diagnostic purposes but all imaging must be used with caution as similar pathological changes may be seen in people of a similar age who do not report pain.

Ultrasound

In the chronic intractable stages of shoulder pain ultrasound may be used to identify structures which may then be treated by injection with local corticosteroid.

Hemiplegic shoulder pain

On the morning after his arrival on the ward, the nurses report that Mr McTavish is complaining of pain in his left shoulder during routine care.

You know that Mr McTavish has a low-toned, subluxed left shoulder with reduced shoulder shrug and limited range of movement in his left upper limb. It was not clear exactly what happened at the time of his stroke, but given his previous golfing ability and the fact that he was enjoying this sport on holiday when he had the stroke, it is reasonable to assume that he did not have severe problems with the shoulder previously.

Example of improved positioning in a wheelchair

The following pictures show how careful positioning of Mr McTavish and the use of appropriate support (in this case pillows, lap tray and cushion) can influence his alignment.

side-on view of Mr McTavish sitting well in a wheelchair with bullet points labelled 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7
frontal view of Mr McTavish sitting well in a wheelchair with bullet points labelled 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

Specific points to note:

  1. Hips – central and at the back of the wheelchair
  2. Head – central and eyes looking ahead
  3. Left upper limb – supported by laptray
  4. Right upper limb – supported by laptray and no longer required for balance
  5. Footplates – correctly adjusted so that ankles, knees and hips are at 90 degrees which will help to reduce tone
  6. Appropriate pressure relieving contoured cushion
  7. Pillow used to ‘take up the slack’ in the wheelchair back in this case

NB: Consider making a referral for a specialist wheelchair assessment

Examples of poor and improved positioning in a wheelchair:

Poor positioning

These pictures shows Mr McTavish who has left-sided hemiplegia and is unable to maintain a good sitting position in his wheelchair due to a lack of support.

side-on view of Mr McTavish sitting in wheelchair with bullet points labelled 1 to 7
frontal view of Mr McTavish siting in wheelchair with bullet points labelled 1 to 6

Specific points to note:

  1. Hips – not central and too far forward in wheelchair
  2. Head – orientated to the right with eye/gaze deviation to the right
  3. Left upper limb – increased tone
  4. Right upper limb – required to help maintain his balance
  5. Footplates in left hand photo are too high, causing increased pressure on sacral regions, in the right hand photo there are no footplates causing the patient to slip down in the wheelchair putting increased pressure on the thighs
  6. Inadequate pressure relieving cushion
  7. Back of wheelchair sagging

Example of improved positioning in a chair

A picture of a patient sitting in a chair correctly.

The picture shows how careful positioning of Mr McTavish and the use of appropriate support (pillows in this case) can influence his alignment.

Specific points to note:

  1. Hips – central and at the back of the chair
  2. Trunk – supported with pillows to prevent side flexion to the right
  3. Head – central and eyes looking ahead
  4. Right upper limb – supported with pillows and no longer required for balance
  5. Left upper limb – supported with pillows to help reduce tone
  6. Feet flat on floor – positioning ankles, knees and hips at 90° will help reduce tone

NB: Consider making a referral for a specialist seating assessment